By damage the legislator understands the deliberate damage or destruction of a strange thing. Apart from the theft and the fraud the damage represents one of the most frequently committed criminal offences in Germany.
The damage regulates 303 StGB in Germany "§. Damage is from the type a passing. Apart from the damage separately as facts used "§ 303a (data modification) and "§ 303b (computer sabotage), since data are not things in the sense of right. After "§ 303c in each case charges are necessary for the damage, the data modification and the computer sabotage. Furthermore the damage is a Privatklagedelikt and is incidental actionable.
In Austria these circumstances regulate "§"§ 125 and 126a to 126c StGB, in Switzerland kind 144 and 144bis.
Under the term of the thing each physical article, but also animals do not only fall. Here "§ 90a BGB does not apply. Furthermore without meaning it is whether the thing has any value. So also house remainders already destroyed can be further damaged. Also the state of aggregation (firmly, liquid, gaseously) does not play a role. With gaseous things however the definableness of the thing is necessary (gas bottle With animals "§ 17 animal law for the protection is to be still observed.
The thing must be strange. This characteristic is to be understood as with the theft: The thing is strange, if it stands not in the sole property of the author and is not abandoned.
Act actions are damaging or destroying. Damages is a not insignificant injury of the special substance. If a thing is only dirty and if it can be cleaned without large expenditure, then the thing was not damaged. That applies since the entry into force of the nine and thirtieth criminal law law of change however only to that extent, the appearance is temporarily changed not only insignificant and not only (paragraph 2). This law had the express objective to be able to seize Graffiti criminally. Whether one reached, can show only practice, exists nevertheless already now already at the Universities of doubts about the aptitudeness "§ 303 exp. 2 n. F. regarding the basiclegally required certainty.
Destroying is a so substantial damage of the thing that their useability is completely waived. To that extent this alternative course of action is unnecessary, when it is covered anyway of damaging.
The extraction of the special substance is not a damage. A strange thing to throw away or the fly letting of a bird is not punishable (whereby a minority is concerning the latter of other view). Partially to the fact it is turned off whether on a damage immediately is to be counted. So birds from southern Gefilden in Germany in the liberty might have hardly a chance of survival, with which a damage could be affirmed.
The act must happen deliberately, whereby it is already sufficient, if the author does not wish the damage of the thing, it however nevertheless considers possible and approves of (so-called contingent resolution). A negligent damage is not punishable.
The illegality ("" illegally" ") is not a factual characteristic, but only concretizing injustice.
The attempt of the damage is posed in paragraph 3 under punishment.
The damage is frequent Begleitdelikt with the housing break-down theft. Mostly is to be proceeded here however from law unit. Concomitance arises with the crimes against the person, if a weapon is led against humans or force is exercised and the clothes are damaged.
The facts "§ of the 303a StGB read:
The facts of the computer sabotage ("§ 303b StGB) read:
(1) Who disturbs a data processing, which is for a strange enterprise, a strange enterprise or an authority of substantial importance, thus that he
with imprisonment up to five years or with fine one punishes.
(2) The attempt is punishable.
Both facts try to ensure the introduction of the new media by protection of data and data processing on criminal basis. Whether this actually succeeds was so far controversially discussed, in the literature. In particular against virus programmers this protection, however not for reasons of the facts, fails but because of determination successes lacking. Besides the determinations step frequently into conflict with the data security, so that a right-national preliminary investigation cannot be accomplished.
Apart from the basic facts of the damage are still three qualification facts. They differ from the basic facts beside the increased punishing frameworks above all also in the fact that they are not only pursued on request. Similarly to that in the following indicated paragraphs similar regulations in Austria by "§ 126, in Switzerland apply by kind 144.
During "§ 303 the property of the individual (partial public property) protects, the damage of public property, if it falls under "§ the 304 StGB, with a increased punishing framework is threatened:
The characteristic of the facts is here that the author can be also owners of the thing. Strange property is not protected, but the public interest in the soundness of the articles.
The destruction of buildings is a qualification after "§ 305 StGB:
The rail body (also of streetcars) is to be only understood by railways. If the destruction by fire putting is committed, then the arson goes ("§"§ 306 FF. StGB) the forwards.
Even if for the fight against terrorism intended, has the destruction of important media after "§ 305a StGB a special meaning by the fact won that the vehicles of the police and the German Federal Armed Forces were equipped with a separate protection:
(1) Who illegally
totally or partly destroyed, with imprisonment up to five years or with fine one punishes.
(2) The attempt is punishable.
We found here 55 articles.
We found here 5 related websites.
Index | Privacy | Terms Of Use | Sitemap | Feedback